In a continuing effort to get the local Appalachian Mountain Club chapter to acknowledge and accept barefoot hiking as a safe and healthy way to get outdoors. Their resistance is especially nonsensical in that it runs against their own diversity statement, plus the fact that all trip participants are asked to sign one of these which theoretically absolves AMC of any and all responsibility.
This is not how you "make the outdoors welcoming for everyone".
2019 sometime:
Newsletter article
(published by the Cape Cod chapter instead of the Boston-based "Mud")
We were possibly working on raising some awareness, but it apparently failed.
July 2022:
Not renewing AMC membership
out of disgust/disappointment with their degenerating attitude post-Covid.
Sorry, they don't take my money and then exclude me from
activities.
As reasonable adult conversation with AMC seemed to get taken off the table, around the beginning of 2023 I started playing a little game with them. I could read the hike listings and decide to wander into the same patch of woods the same day, and possibly cross paths with the group and simply be seen briefly. Maybe participants in a group would get a glimmer that barefoot hiking is really a thing, and possibly get more curious about it. A handful of fun writeups [which this section now replaces] emerged from that with the overall theme of "hunting", but apparently that concept scared the crap out of some people who completely misinterpreted my intent. A little tone-deaf in my writing style, perhaps, but only the opinions of some random guy on the internet and which included no violent or threatening content.
Let it be clear: There was never any intent of harm or even "harassment" in those little adventures. Read on.
They were in fact just for innocent fun along with some entertaining logistical/timing challenges once in a while. A different hike group I'm with regularly has a few AMC members who also go on AMC outings (shod!), and when I told them about this "sport" they thought it was hilarious. A subset even expressed that I should be actively obnoxious and show up at startpoints, but really, I'm not that vengeful a person. Really, all I wanted was a little common sense and even *known precedent* applied to my situation, preferably coming from AMC's upper leadership. Despite my repeated pleas over the years, that never came.
June 2023:
Actual accepted participation in a
show-n-go outing,
in Willowdale, due to a rare sensible leader
(Robin Doyle)
-> Notably, Marc Hurwitz aka "hiddenboston" was along too, a leader
that I'd been out
with a few times pre-pandemic but had more or less turned against me since.
So he got to see me once again happily barefoot in the woods, whether he
liked it or not.
[... Maybe there is actually some hope ...]
July 2023:
Popped briefly out of the woods at a Middlesex Fells trailhead I had
not known about
previously, were it not for a
REGI posting
about "Explore the North Reservoir area".
Thanked the leader for that enlightenment, and vanished into the woods
again to continue the
solo jaunt I was already 2 miles into.
(Thurman Smith)
At this point, though, the volunteer coordinator got wind of my game and stepped in via email with several false accusations, notably "trying to randomly show up for registration-required hikes unannounced". That was total bullshit, as the only hikes I had *participated* in recently were open show-and-go with no registration, and informally *approved* by their leaders. I refuted a lot of what she said, but that probably just soured the relationship even further. Honestly, do I have to point out the gulf of difference between "showing up" at a startpoint and trying to force my way into full attendance with a group, versus maybe being spotted briefly somewhere by its participants as they would anyone else hiking in a park any given day? The level of flat-out psychosis in the Local Walks committee was really reaching a fever pitch. Anyone external who I described this sad situation to agreed that AMC's take on it was completely unfounded, ludicrous and control-freak.
So, for any AMC affiliates reading this far:
If you're going to accuse someone of "stalking", you need to define it
in the right context.
Tracking something in a natural setting is the classic definition, which has
been the basis of many kinds of games and puzzles for hundreds of years.
That's my working definition: a simple game to me, a "fox hunt" in the
ham-radio sense with more mobile targets, a silly little test
of skill which harms or imperils no one.
That kind of activity could range an entire spectrum, from geocaching to
paintball, and nobody's making personal accusations over that.
It is not your misapplied "internet definition", especially when it didn't
particularly matter who the leaders or participants were, the aim was to
simply find them and pass by and not even worry about it if I couldn't.
Get a grip. You know exactly how to turn the text past this point into positive experiences and even endorsements for the organization to others. It's up to you.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
_
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
In moments of reflection, I wandered through some of the
resources
for AMC volunteers, and found the
Leader Handbook,
a fairly monster PDF.
The entire first *third* of that reads almost like a psychology textbook,
going deep into interaction with trip participants and how to skirt carefully
around any problematic DEI areas or negative aspects of an experience.
So AMC leader training is likely to produce obedient disciples who are already
walking on eggshells, terrified of offending someone and far more likely to
adopt a stricter rules-based approach to everything.
This is not, however, how you "welcome new ideas", notably barefooting, if
you're going to wind up so steeped in the "gear lore" that you blindly
reject anything out of the ordinary on principle without actually stopping
to learn more about it.
Read more barefoot advocacy
_H* collection started 230516